Chinese representative local festivals can be divided into three models according to their characteristics and their orientations as follows: the “Government- Oriented-Exhibition Type”, the “Market-Oriented-Sales Type” and the “Industry- Oriented-Professional Type”. Also, they can be divided into B2B (Business to Business, that is, marketing relationship between companies) and B2C (Business to Customer, that is, marketing relationship between company and individual). Among them, this study looked at the development strategy of B2C (Business to Customer, that is, marketing relationship between company and individual) by taking the International Animation Film Festival held in Hangzhou City, represents Zhejiang Province in China, as an example. The International Animation Film Festival in Hangzhou City is a key industry in this region and plays a central role in the local development and the development of local cultural contents industry, and aims to develop its international animation film festival based on the “Hangzhou Model” into differentiated branded-festival from other domestic animation film festivals in China. Especially, its B2C strategy, a major development strategy, plays an important role in securing regional competitiveness through the development of regional cultural industry and local festivals. Besides, it emphasizes the economic ripple effect of local festivals through customers’ direct participation in them, and furthermore, it can present more potential for development by combining them with various industries with good market prospects like film and game industries.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

The international society adopted the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 and the Paris agreement in 2015 after signing on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNFCCC) in June 1992 to cope with the problem of climate change according to global warming. The Paris agreement is expected to be enacted in January 2021 and aims to maintain the increase of the average temperature of the earth by lower than two degrees through the reduction of greenhouse emissions and limit it to 1.5 degrees. Thus, all countries that signed on the Paris agreement are given the duty to make an effort to reduce greenhouse gas voluntarily. China is a country directly involved in joining the Paris agreement, making a lot of effort to keep the promise of the implementation by setting the objective of the reduction of carbon dioxide to 60 to 65% compared to that as of 2005 by 2030. In particular, it is operating carbon emissions trading exchanges in eight provinces and cities, adopting the Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme in 2013, and carbon emissions trading is actively done. Also, China has enacted laws and technical norms, such as “Carbon Emission Report Management Measures” and “Interim Measures for the Management of Carbon Emissions Trading” as the laws related to carbon emissions trading and is gathering opinions, announcing “Interim Regulations on the Management of Carbon Emissions Trading” on April 3, 2019 to standardize carbon emissions trading, improve the control and management of greenhouse gas emissions, promote the ecological civilization and promote the sustainable development of the economic society. Based on the Chinese government’s effort, as China showed a clear decreasing tendency of greenhouse gas emissions since 2015, China is putting spur to the preparation of legislation and the maintenance of the system to further expand the carbon emissions trading market nationwide. Meanwhile, after the Paris agreement came into effect in 2021, each country should make a lot of effort to implement the reduction objectives set by itself, and the Republic of Korea, a country directly involved in that cannot be an exception. Currently, the Republic of Korea also operating the Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme in the same form as that of China; however, it is not revitalized due to a few circumstances. And yet, it is judged that centering around the Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme, investigating China’s laws related to climate change response and making an active effort to revitalize the Republic of Korea’s carbon emissions trading market, analyzing the operation status. will help implement the duty to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the future.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

This study comprehensively analyzed the development status and characteristics of major new industries, the growth strategy of innovative enterprises and those new industries’ sources of competitiveness, centering on Shenzhen, China, a representative innovative city in China. Shenzhen City is developing 5G, robots, system semiconductors and electric vehicles into key new industries. Analysts say that the reason for the rapid development of these and other new industries in Shenzhen is that they utilize elements of the ICT technologies, balanced industrial ecosystems and commercialization capabilities in the Shenzhen area. The number of PCT patent applications in Shenzhen area accounts for 45.6 percent of all such applications in China, and is considered the most advanced technology accumulation area in China as research and development is carried out around private innovative companies. In terms of industrial ecology, Shenzhen is also the world’s best: based on the number of SMEs, the number of startups and the innovation of large companies and startups, Shenzhen City boasts a global level. In terms of commercialization capacity, Shenzhen’s economy is the most active in China, and the large companies that have emerged from startups include global companies including Tencent, DJI, ZTE and Huawei. It is urgent to design new Korea-China cooperation measures in new industries in Shenzhen, such as 5G, robots, system semiconductors, and electric cars, where industrial innovation is occuring rapidly.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

The Trump administration has responded to the Chinese pursuit of a hegemony with the “Free, Open Indo-Pacific Strategy (FOIP strategy).” This paper analyzes its intentions and implementation measures by examining the two government documents of ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnership and Promoting a Networked Region,’ and ‘Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. ’ Reflecting the republican liberal dichotomous perspective of good and evil, the FOIP strategy views US as pursuing a free vision and China as doing a repressive one of the world. It identifies China as the greatest threat to US, challenging the liberal international order and trying to capture a hegemony in the Western Pacific areas, particularly Southeast Asia. The FOIP strategy purports to contain and frustrate the Chinese hegemonic pursuit in the Indo-Pacific region by strengthening a alliance or semi-alliance relationship, establishing a strategic partnership or continuing engagement with the countries in the region. However, most of the Southeast Asian states are skeptical of the FOIP strategy. Considering the regional states’ strategies towards the US-China rivalry, including the regional institutional balancing against it and the flexible bilateral responses to it, such as balancing, bandwagoning and hedging, to promote national or leaders’ political interests, the effective FOIP strategy should take on a pragmatic and strategic rather than a value-laden exceptionalist approach.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

China’s rapid GDP growth and the widening trade deficit with the United States have raised concerns about China’s economic growth. In 2010, Edward Steinfeld, then professor of MIT, argued that China’s rise poses no threat to the United States and advanced Western countries as it plays the games under the rules made by the United States. But there have also been warnings that China’s technological upgrade is no longer compatible with the U.S.-led globalization. US officials criticize “Made in China 2025” as “crimes, not technology upgrading,” which aim to raise the country’s self-sufficiency in core technologies, parts, and materials in the high-tech industry to 40 percent by 2020 and 70 percent by 2025. This paper discusses whether strategic competition between the US and China poses a threat to the U.S.-led world order with the case studies in the field of AI and 5G, and looks at how strategic competition between the US and China, the main actors of the international order, is making any interaction with existing globalization. Advances in technologies such as 5G and AI are promoting a cross-border movement of services, which can shock the United States and China in different ways. In the case of the US, the US has begun to tighten its control over foreign immigration to protect manufacturing sectors in the US after Trump’s presidency. If the border movement of services becomes more active, services could be outsourced more broadly without the physical flow of immigrants, and it will have a big impact on the local labor market. In China’s case, despite its competitiveness in AI and 5G technologies that promote cross-border movement of information and services, it is likely to be used to maintain the Communist Party’s authoritarian rule more efficiently than to encourage free movement of information and services. There is also a strong trend to establish a mutually exclusive system, as the US administration encourages allies to refrain from using Huawei networking equipment, and China takes action against them. However, there is also the possibility of establishing a multipolar order where mutual competition and cooperation coexist, unlike the Cold War era.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

Recent trade dispute between US and China is so fierce as war. It seems to be due to the international economic policy of the US, so-called “America First.” In a modern society, because a country’s policy is deeply related with national economy, foreign trade disputes have a significant impact on its own interests. On the other hand, the intellectual property right based on High technology is important for the national security and future economy, so each country are focused on preventing and protecting infringement of it. In particular, the US-China trade war is expanding to the technological warfare in terms of the protection of their own intellectual property right. China, recognized that the trade dispute will be prolonged, has been enacting related policies and laws on its own technology. Chinese central government is making its efforts into supporting the artificial intelligence(AI) which is one of the future industries, Thus, the paper studies the main policy and the applied technologies of China. The paper, first of all, examines the history of the development of AI artificial intelligence technology of China, and its policies and laws to be fostering its development. Besides, it analyzes the industrial sectors where AI is currently applied so as to figure out the problem on the theory and practical application of AI technology policy. Based on the current policies of China on the AI technology, the paper examines how it differs from the US in AI policy. Through the study, it will provide an important implication to Korea’s AI policy.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

In order to solve the legislative cannot timely response to the new problems brought by the social transformation, the judicial organs will not explicitly stipulated in the criminal law of the illegal management behavior “expansion” to the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation, application expansion variation leads to crime of illegal business out of, severely impact the clarity of the crime legal principle, and leads to abuse the power of criminal penalty and civil rights violations. The high abstraction in legislation and the alienation in judicature lead to the expansion and variation of the clause of illegal business operation, which in essence is the conflict between the function of protecting human rights and the function of protecting legal interests, and the root cause is the conflict between economic freedom and state intervention. The narrowed ways to resolve the conflict include avoiding the conflict and applying the civil law, administrative law or other specific charges to protect the interests as far as possible. In balancing conflicts, under the premise of protecting the interests of the law, judicial interpretations, guiding cases, indictments and judgments should, as far as possible, implement the principle of clarity. Conflict game, the function of legal interest protection is greater than the function of human rights protection can be applied to the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation. Through the analysis of the predicament in the judicial application of the provisions on the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation, the reasons for the expansion and variation of the application are abstractly extracted, the rational analysis is made from the perspective of the principle of clarity, the essence and root of the conflict are dug out, and the narrowed ways are put forward. In order to narrow the abuse of the right of punishment and protect the human rights of citizens, we should narrow the scope of application of the provisions on the underpayment of he miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation to the maximum extent through the above-mentioned ways to solve the conflicts.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

In order to encourage new ventures and try to create a more friendly business environment to attract investors, in recent years, Taiwan has amended the company law to give enterprises more flexibility and loosen many laws and regulations. One of the major amendments is the comprehensive introduction of Par value stock system. The stocks issued by the company constitute the company's capital, and denominated or non-denominated stocks are involved, which involves the company's capital structure, shareholders' equity, accounting and tax issues. The introduction of the non-par value stock system in Taiwan can be said to be a major change in the overall capital system norms. It is no longer misled by the traditional concept of "capital" multiplied by the total number of stocks issued, enabling shareholders and creditors to pay more attention to the company's operating performance as well as the real asset situation, and taking into account the company's funding needs. Recognizing the theoretical misunderstanding and lack of functions of denominated stocks, many scholars in the mainland have already discussed the existence and abolition of the denominated stocks system, and many have called for the introduction of the denominated shares system. However, for the reform of a legal system, the first consideration should still be whether the mainland has a need to implement a no-denomination stocks system. Considering that the mainland has gradually moved from capital credit to asset credit on the corporate legal system in recent years, there is indeed a practice for the no par value stock system. In light of the above requirements, the amendment of the company law in Taiwan should be of great significance to the legal system of promoting the no-denomination stock system in the mainland of China.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

This paper analyzed the competitiveness of export to ASEAN of the three East Asian countries by utilizing the Constant Market Share(CMS) model according to the BEC code classification from the perspective of GVC. An analysis of 2001 to 2016 divided into three sections showed that South Korea's competitiveness continues to rise; China remains relatively high competitiveness; Japan's competitiveness has a negative impact on its exports to ASEAN. As we divided the factors of competitive by production process, Korea has seen a significant increase in competitiveness in parts and accessories. On the other hand, Japan has negative influence on both intermediate and final goods except raw materials, and China maintains relatively stable competitiveness in both intermediate and final goods.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

This paper analyzes the characteristics of 20 Chinese overseas industrial parks approved by the Chinese government. The analysis results are as follows. First, Chinese overseas industrial parks were mainly led by China to pursue economic profits abroad, not by recipient countries. Chinese companies, which lack experience in overseas expansion, were able to reduce costs and risks by entering overseas industrial parks. Second, it was the private enterprises, not Chinese government, who actively created the overseas industrial parks. Of the 20 major overseas industrial parks, 14 were created by private enterprises. Third, Chinese overseas industrial parks are usually created by enterprises first and later approved by the Chinese government. In addition, most overseas industrial parks were first established before 2013, when China proposed the Belt & Road initiative. Fourth, Chinese overseas Industrial parks were developed with distinctive features in each region, considering the economic efficiency of each industrial park's specialized role and development potential. These characteristics indicate that Chinese companies' overseas expansion through the overseas industrial parks was driven by economic efficiency rather than by policy objectives such as China's BRI. Chinese companies’ overseas expansion and construction of overseas industrial parks were concentrated in Southeast Asia. In addition, with the strengthening of international industrial division between Southeast Asia and China, China’s market share in the region is increasing. On the other hand, Korea has a declining market share in most regions except Vietnam, therefore it is urgent to establish a new policy.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel