The current administrative reconsideration procedures, as stipulated in the Administrative Reconsideration Law, exhibit administrative procedural characteristics. These are evident in the greater emphasis on efficiency in the administrative reconsideration trial, the granting of broader procedural discretion to the administrative reconsideration subject, and the respect for the administrative discretion of the administrative reconsideration subject. However, due to the nature of dispute adjudication, the focus on administrative efficiency in administrative reconsideration trial often hinders the rectification of administrative misconduct, the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned, and the legislative goals of administrative internal supervision. This has resulted in several problems, including the overlap between the reconsideration subject and one of the parties concerned, excessive negligence of due process, the necessity to establish a coherence procedure with litigation, and the need to strengthen the professionalism of reconsideration organizations and personnel. Therefore, to align with the system goal of making administrative reconsideration as the main channel for the substantive settlement of administrative disputes, it is recommended to establish an administrative reconsideration department under the same level of government to centralize the management of administrative reconsideration cases, to formulate procedural rules for the quasi-judicialization of administrative reconsideration trials, to add organic coherence procedures with administrative litigation, and to formulate a special system for the selection and career development of administrative reconsideration commissioners, so as to complete the construction of the quasi-judicialization of administrative reconsideration trial procedures.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

Understanding the origins of China's legal culture and legal system is the basis for understanding the characteristics of Chinese law, and furthermore, it can serve as a background for research on the direction and diagnosis of social change in the field of law in Chinese society. Each country or community in the world is bound to have a different legal system or legal system due to its historical background and geographical differences. Sometimes the action of law affects other communities through political, military, or cultural action, but the creation of a single genealogy by the culture of the unique law and the elements of the counted law can be seen as an essential process for all communities. Each country or community will have its own principle of maintaining order, and key elements can become essential characteristics of its legal culture or legal system. China's traditional legal system has had a strong and international influence for a considerable amount of time in human history, and it has played a direct role in the formation of the legal system or culture of neighboring countries. China's traditional legal system or legal culture can be seen as one of the major legal systems before modern times, and it can be admitted that it played a significant role in the formation of the legal system and legal culture in terms of human history. The theory and distinction of establishing a Chinese legal system have been transplanted from the Soviet Union, and in theory, the economic characteristics of the sharing system and the political characteristics of the class struggle ideology have had a significant impact on or greatly restricted the pre-New China legal system, which was developed by counting continental legal elements. There has never been a definitive theory to explain which legal system China's legal system belongs to. This can be found in the fact that the Chinese legal system is a mixture of traditional Chinese law, continental law elements, and socialist law, and since the reform and opening in 1978, especially under the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the upheaval in the Eastern Bloc, China has advocated "construction of the socialist rule of law." However, in terms of content, it has absorbed a relatively large number of Western legal systems, accepted many basic systems of continental and Anglo-American legal systems in the field of 私, introduced principles such as "criminal court" and "open trial" in the field of criminal law, and adopted Western legal theories and systems such as establishing respective punishment regulations in the field of social law. China's legal system and the rule of law still have many tasks, but a full and gradual approach such as "function of law," "establishment of a legislative system," "improvement of legislative technology," "legal approach and research," and "realization of constitutional supervision" is needed.

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel

• EndNote
• RefWorks
• Scholar's Aid
• BibTeX

Export Citation Cancel